C.I.A. Lacing

Lacing (pic)

Taught to C.I.A. officers during the Cold War, one or more “signal” crossovers is placed between straight segments for covert signalling. (From: Robert Wallace)

NOTE: I've used slightly different color-coding on these diagrams, with only the visible crossover(s) that form the basis of the covert “signals” highlighted in yellow.

Six pairs of eyelets, variation 1
Pairs
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
4
3
Step
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Flip

To activate controls, please enable JavaScript

Lacing Technique – Variation 1 – Low visible X above one straight segment

• Begin straight across on the outside and in through the bottom eyelets.

• Cross the ends on the inside and feed out through the next higher set of eyelets.

• Cross the ends on the outside and feed in through the next higher set of eyelets. This forms the “signal” crossover (shown in yellow).

• The left end crosses diagonally on the inside, then straight across on the outside.

• The right end crosses diagonally on the inside at a steeper angle, then straight across on the outside.

• Alternate running the left and right ends diagonally until lacing is completed.

Features

Covert signalling

Best on dress shoes

Messy on sneakers

“Shortens” ends

Notes

Book (pic)

• This set of seven methods was originally included in the secret manual “Recognition Signals”, one of two instructional manuals produced for the C.I.A. by noted magician John Mulholland in 1953. Both manuals were declassified in 2007, while in 2009 a book about them titled “The Official C.I.A. Manual of Trickery and Deception” was released.

• I have attempted to faithfully recreate the seven diagrams kindly supplied to me by author Robert Wallace from his “copy-of-a-copy” of the original manuscripts. The originals were for shoes with six pairs of eyelets, but can easily be adapted for different numbers (as I have done with the variations for 3, 4 or 5 pairs).

• Note that there is no fixed meaning attached to any particular variation. The signals would typically have been agreed upon in advance. For example, it might be agreed that an officer would use Variation 1 to signal “concealed package” or Variation 2 to signal “empty handed”.

• These methods are designed mainly for use on the types of shoes that C.I.A. officers would have worn in the 1950s, typically Oxfords (Balmorals) where the sides of the shoes meet in the middle (as seen in the first photo below). On such shoes, the underlying mess of laces is hidden on the inside, with only the horizontals plus “signal” crossovers visible on the outside.

C.I.A. Lacing Theory

Although these techniques appear to be complicated for anyone – even a secret agent! – to memorize, the logic behind them is quite simple: Each technique is only a slight variation of Straight European Lacing, which was likely the “standard” way of lacing agents' shoes – and thus one with which they were already familiar.

The theory was that an agent could fairly quickly and easily un-lace their shoe up to a particular point, replace the existing horizontals with one or more visible crossovers, then re-lace the rest of the shoe with the “standard” lacing.

Shoelace Lengths for C.I.A. Lacing

Variation 1 – Low visible X
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs135 cm53 in–0.9 cm–0.4 in
7 pairs124 cm49 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
6 pairs113 cm45 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
5 pairs102 cm40 in–0.2 cm–0.1 in
4 pairs91 cm36 in
3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 2 – Mid visible X
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs135 cm53 in–0.9 cm–0.4 in
7 pairs124 cm49 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
6 pairs113 cm45 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
5 pairs102 cm40 in–0.2 cm–0.1 in
4, 3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 3 – High visible X
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs135 cm53 in–0.9 cm–0.4 in
7 pairs124 cm49 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
6 pairs113 cm45 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
5, 4, 3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 4 – Two Xs spread apart
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs135 cm53 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
7 pairs124 cm49 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
6 pairs113 cm45 in–0.2 cm–0.1 in
5, 4, 3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 5 – Two Xs close together
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs135 cm53 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
7 pairs124 cm49 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
6 pairs113 cm45 in–0.2 cm–0.1 in
5 pairs102 cm40 in
4, 3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 6 – Three visible Xs
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
(No change
to ends)
8 pairs133 cm53 in
7 pairs123 cm48 in
6 pairs112 cm44 in
5, 4, 3, 2 pairs = (N/A)
Variation 7 – Bottom visible X
Pairs of
eyelets
Approximate
length needed
“Shortens”
ends by
8 pairs136 cm53 in–1.1 cm–0.4 in
7 pairs125 cm49 in–0.9 cm–0.4 in
6 pairs114 cm45 in–0.7 cm–0.3 in
5 pairs103 cm41 in–0.4 cm–0.2 in
4 pairs92 cm36 in–0.2 cm–0.1 in
3 pairs81 cm32 in
2 pairs = (N/A)

NOTE: These are approximate shoelace lengths for using this lacing on an average sized sneaker. For more accurate lengths, use the Shoelace Length Calculator.

Comparative Length

• Longer shoelaces needed than those for basic Criss Cross Lacing.

• If the original shoelaces are re-used, this method effectively shortens the ends.

More details about length comparisons.

Rate This Lacing Method


• Select rating, then click button to submit.

• Or, view results without rating this method.

Please only vote once – multiple votes are removed daily

Support Ian

Sponsors

Click to buy shoelaces from Loop King Laces (USA)
Click to buy shoelaces from Loop Queen (USA)
Click to buy shoelaces from Laced Up Laces (USA)
Click to buy tough shoelaces from Ironlace (USA)
Click to buy shoelaces from Big Laces (UK)
Click to buy shoelaces from Kicks Shoelaces (Australia)

This page last updated: 05-Jun-2024. Copyright © 2014-2024 by Ian W. Fieggen. All rights reserved.

Website created by Ian Fieggen (aka. “Professor Shoelace”), inventor of the Ian Knot.

Ian's Other Websites:
Software Site (icon)SoftwareGraphics Site (icon)GraphicsIan's Site (icon)IanChris' site (icon)ChrisFamily tree (icon)Tree

Gallery photo

❌ Close