CAF Combat Boot Lacing
The official method prescribed by the Canadian Armed Forces for lacing combat boots, safety boots and lineman boots.
CAF Combat Boot Lacing Tutorial
To activate controls, please enable JavaScript
Lacing Technique
• Begin straight across on the outside (grey section) and in through the bottom eyelets.
• To simplify the lacing, one end at a time will be zig-zagged all the way up the boot, beginning with the end nearest the little toe.
TIP: The following instructions are for lacing the right boot. Use the “Flip” button to show the left boot diagram and instructions.
• The little-toe-end of the right boot is the left (blue) end. Run the blue end diagonally right, left, right, left, etc., each time feeding in through the eyelet on the next higher row. Continue until the blue end reaches the top of the boot.
• The big-toe-end of the right boot is the right (yellow) end. Run the yellow end diagonally left, right, left, right, etc., each time crossing over the blue end before feeding in through the eyelet on the next higher row.
• When done, all crossovers should have the yellow end consistently on top of the blue end.
Features
Efficient to lace
Efficient to tighten
Difficult dress code
Notes
• Lacing one end at a time can be tricky on tall boots because of the constricted boot opening after completing the “little-toe-end”. This makes the “big-toe-end” harder to manipulate on the inside. The lacing can instead be laced row-by-row (like regular Criss Cross Lacing), provided that you take care to mirror the crossovers at each row so that the “big-toe-end” is always on top.
• This lacing is also used by some Canadian ice hockey players, who believe that it creates a tighter fit for ice skates. In this context it is often referred to simply as “Canadian Lacing”.
• This method is basically a subtle variation of Display Shoe Lacing, with the difference being simply the orientation of the crossovers in the middle of the boot. The Canadian military's prescribed technique (see “Military Specs” below) shows the crossovers mirrored at each row plus the whole lacing mirrored between the left and right boot.
Military Specs
(Excerpt from the official document A-DH-265-000/AG-001, dated 15-Dec-2017):
• CANADIAN ARMED FORCES DRESS INSTRUCTIONS
• Chapter 2: Policy and Appearance
• Section 2: Appearance
• Subsection 20: Footwear
• b: Footwear shall be laced as shown in Figure 2-2-6.
• Note that Figure 2-2-6 includes the caption “Herring Bone Method”. Strictly speaking, the alternating crossovers of this method don't produce a true “herringbone” pattern. An accurate herringbone pattern (as used in fabrics, tiling, parquetry, etc.) has consistent crossovers – either all left-over-right or all right-over-left.
• Figure 2-2-6 also included a separate “Straight Across Method” for ankle boots/shoes (not shown here – see Straight Easy Lacing).
Why the Complexity?
For some time, I was puzzled by the reasoning behind the quite specific military specs (above). What's with all the mirroring of crossovers / boots? Why go to the trouble of creating a regulation, drawing up complex diagrams, teaching it to cadets, and enforcing their compliance – all without any explanation? Surely there must be some purpose to all this, not just military regulations for no reason?
Efficient lacing
My first thought was that it was simply a way that the boots can be efficiently laced. Zig-zagging one end all the way to the top, then zig-zagging the other end all the way to the top, is pretty efficient.
Lacing this way naturally results in alternating crossovers in the middle, with the “big-toe-end” always on top (as seen in this animated pic). In other words, the outcome (the alternating crossovers) simply results from the requirement (the efficient lacing) rather than the other way round.
So why focus on the outcome? Why not simply teach the efficient way of lacing?
Likewise, the reasoning behind mirroring the left and right boots is also not explained. Is it purely for aesthetics?
Ian's revelation!
While I was creating the above “big-toe-end” highlights, I suddenly had a revelation as to the real reason behind this lacing. If true – it's actually pretty clever!
Naturally paired lace segments
The lace segments down either side of the boot are naturally grouped into easily-accessible “pairs” of adjacent segments (see animated pic below). Because successive pairs are on alternate sides of the boot, they can be efficiently tightened as follows:
Efficient tightening technique
• Use your left hand to grab the lowest pair of angled segments on the inner side of your right boot.
• Pull upwards and inwards to tighten the start of the lacing.
• Don't let go of that pair of segments just yet!
• Use your right hand to grab the next higher pair of angled segments on the outer side of the boot (one row higher than the inner pair).
• Pull upwards and outwards to take up the tension from the left hand.
• This completes the tightening of that previous (lower) pair, freeing the left hand to proceed to the next higher pair.
• Continue pulling progressively higher pairs with one hand while slowly releasing lower pairs from the other hand so that the tension is smoothly transferred left and right up the boot one pair at a time.
• When done tightening, finish off with your preferred Shoelace Knot. This completes the right boot.
• Finally, mirror all of the above steps to complete the other boot. For example, begin with your right hand grabbing the lowest pair of angled segments on the inner side of your left boot.
Maintaining tension
This technique ensures that the tension is easily maintained throughout the whole tightening process. Compare this with how regular Criss Cross Lacing is tightened, where one typically lets go of one row in order to grab the next higher row – in the process losing much of the tension.
Note that it is possible to alternate both hands to tighten Criss Cross Lacing. But it's trickier because the hands get in each other's way in the middle of the boot. With CAF Combat Boot Lacing, the hands are kept apart, each pulling naturally – and strongly – from its own side of the boot.
Summary
CAF Combat Boot Lacing can be efficiently laced – plus it can also be efficiently tightened. That makes it doubly efficient!
Pretty cool, huh?
Hopefully this page prompts the Canadian military authorities to update their training so that the benefits of CAF Combat Boot Lacing can be fully appreciated.
Shoelace Lengths for CAF Combat Boot Lacing
| Pairs of eyelets | Approximate length needed | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 pairs | 133 cm | 53 in |
| 7 pairs | 123 cm | 48 in |
| 6 pairs | 112 cm | 44 in |
| 5 pairs | 102 cm | 40 in |
| 4 pairs | 91 cm | 36 in |
| 3 pairs | 81 cm | 32 in |
| 2 pairs | 70 cm | 28 in |
NOTE: These are approximate shoelace lengths for using this lacing on an average sized sneaker. For more accurate lengths, use the Shoelace Length Calculator.
Comparative Length
• Same length shoelaces as those for basic Criss Cross Lacing.
More details about length comparisons.
Visitor Feedback
I came back to your website and searched for another criss cross variant and stumbled over caf combat boots.
I think that will be my next lacing of choice. It's easy to lace when you are a bit used to. Shure it looks a bit messy. But it can be tightened like double helix without the difficulty in the lacing or it can be tightened like normal criss cross lacing.
One thing I did wrong at first. Was that I was thinking the lace that is on the big toe side goes always on top no matter what. Because I was lacing it like criss cross. But as you wrote. Then you have to be careful and keep an eye on the laces so that the one who started at the big toe side is always on top. No matter from which side it comes.
– Lasse, Germany, Jul-2026
When the Canadian Forces' lacing instructions were at best a 2/10 I got referenced to this site and never looked back, thank you.
– Andres S., Canada, Jan-2026
If it helps, I would also suggest making the following points in the description: First, that the lace which is on top “points at the big toe” (if you look at the laces nearest the toe of the boot) and then consistently crosses on top of the other lace all the way up. Second, that every time either lace is to pass through any hole (eyelet), the aglet must “dive down” through the eyelet toward the foot (or leg), and not come up through the eyelet from underneath.
– Jon L., Alberta, Canada, Dec-2018
The Canadian Forces still uses ladder lacing on the ankle boots, and for the combat boots, cross laces, but always with one lace always passing on top to make it easy to undo the boot with a knife to have an injured foot looked at. The laces are also fed from the top of the eyelet, not underneath. I have no idea why, but that's how it's done.
– Kimball M., Canada, Jan-2012
It makes tightening easier since only one lace rubs against the shoe. I make it so my right hand pulls on the bottom lace while my left hand (assumed to be less strong due to my right-handedness) pulls on the top lace.
– Bill P., Michigan USA, Aug-2006
The idea is that the laces are supposed to stay tight due to the friction between the tongue and the sides of the shoe. So, the portion that has already been tightened actually seems to stay locked in whereas, the criss-cross method actually seems to come loose as the shoe expands due to its sponginess. 1 problem with the criss-cross method is that by time you've tightened the top, the middle and lower parts become loosened. I find it hard to explain, but the problem becomes much more apparent in ice skates, where it's tight at the top, but loose at the bottom. The criss-cross method has this problem because the portion of the lace that is about to pass through the eyelet is inbetween the tongue and the sides, thus creating friction and making it harder to tighten, and the portion already passed through the eyelet is relatively loose by comparison.
– Eugene W., Surrey, BC, Canada, Nov-2004
If you'd also like to send feedback, please Contact Ian.
Rate This Lacing Method
Please only vote once – multiple votes are removed daily














Software
Graphics
Ian
Chris
Tree